Legal Opinion
Apeldyn Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 12, 2010No. Civ. 08-568-SLRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In its September 30, 2009 opinion, the court granted a motion, filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America (collectively, “Samsung”), to disqualify R. Tyler Goodwyn, TV (“Goodwyn”) and McKenna Long & Aldridge L.L.P. (“MLA”) as counsel for plaintiff Apeldyn Corporation (“Apeldyn”). Plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of this decision or, in the alternative, certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or for entry of judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). An oral argument was conducted on December 18,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Regalo International, LLC V. Munchkin, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Harbour Antibodies BV v. Teneobio, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nyxoah, Inc. and Nyxoah SADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- United States v. Pressman-Gutman Co., Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010