Legal Opinion

Ralph Hegman Company v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1972No. 43222PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William D. Gunn, Justice. *

Defendant-appellant, Transamerica Insurance Company, issued a “Fidelity One Act Grain Bond,” i. e., a special employee fidelity bond, on codefendant Larkin Mergenthal,* 1 who at the time the bond was issued was an employee of Ralph Hegman Company, plaintiff-respondent. During Mr. Mergenthal’s tenure as a grain elevator manager for the plaintiff corporation, apparent shortages developed. Plaintiff corporation thereafter filed a claim for reimbursement from Mergenthal and the appellant insurer; these claims are the subject of this lawsuit. The court, sitting with a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Christenson v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Allen v. LindemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Molloy v. MolloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Dugal v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. City of Philadelphia v. KennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Labor Relations Commission v. Fall River Educators Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API