Legal Opinion
Ripple v. Wold
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1] On intermediate appeal, defendants contest the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. We affirm.
Facts
[¶ 2] On November 5, 1992, Lester and Maurine Ripple signed two concurrent agreements, a contract for deed and a personal care agreement, both with Roger and Nancy Wold. The Ripples agreed to sell approximately eighty-seven acres of land to the Wolds for $60,000 and the Wolds agreed to personally care for the Ripples. 1 For each month they provided personal services, the Wolds were to receive a $250 credit against their monthly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Tesch v. TeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Riverview Cooperative, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- US Lumber, Inc. v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Davis v. Tennessee Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Maryott v. First National Bank of EdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.