Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Oregon Television, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1997No. 94-10-07049; CA A91533PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In this defamation case, plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his claims against defendants Valentine, Penz and Goebel under ORCP 21, and from a summary judgment in favor of Oregon Television, KPTV and Lars Larson (media defendants). ORCP 47. We reverse.

Defendants Valentine, Penz and Goebel are either elected public officials or public employees who allegedly made defamatory statements about plaintiff. The trial court dismissed them as individual defendants on the ground that they were not proper defendants under ORS 30.285(3)1 and substituted the State of Oregon as the sole party…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Holden v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lowe v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kraemer v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API