Legal Opinion

In Re Kirkman Furniture Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1963No. 593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The appellant has preserved no exceptions entered in the court below nor has it set out any assignments of error in the record on appeal. Even so, since we allowed certiorari, we will examine the record proper to determine whether or not there is error of law appearing thereon adversely affecting the rights of the appellant as between it and the appellees who are parties to the appeal. Schloss v. Jamison, 258 N.C. 271, 128 S.E. 2d 590; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41, 123 S.E. 2d 209; Cratch v. Taylor, 256 N.C. 462, 124 S.E. 2d 124; Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118.

Counsel who…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Illinois Ex Rel. Gordon v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crump v. BD. OF ED. OF HICKORY AD. SUSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Crump v. BD. OF ED. OF HICKORY AD. SUSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Schaffner v. EbelCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  4. State v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API