Legal Opinion

California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges & Hearing Officers in State Employment v. Schwarzenegger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2009No. C058415PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, J.

In these mandamus proceedings, the Attorney General and the union representing the lawyers in his office, among others, assert that the failure of the collective bargaining process under the State Employer-Employee Relations Act (SEERA; Gov. Code, § 3512 et seq.) has caused a *427compensation crisis compromising public service and threatening the Attorney General’s ability to uniformly and adequately enforce the law. Twenty-eight years ago the dissenters in Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 [172 Cal.Rptr. 487, 624 P.2d 1215] (Pacific Legal Foundation) perceived…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Personnel Board v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Professional Engineers v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State Personnel Board v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conger v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Cal. Corr. Peace Officers Ass'n v. Dep't of Corr., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Williams v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API