Legal Opinion

Vieceli v. Cummings

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 26, 1944No. Gen. No. 42,746PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

In a complaint filed in the superior court of Cook county by John Vieeeli against the receivers of the corporations doing business as Chicago Surface Lines, plaintiff asked damages for personal injuries suffered because of negligence in the operation of a bus and also because of the wiful, wanton and malicious conduct in the operation of the bus. Issue was joined and the cause tried before the court and a jury. Motions were made by defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case and at the close of all the evidence to find the defendants not guilty. These motions were denied. Plaintiff’s counsel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dee v. City of PeruIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Greenwald v. B. O. R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Reivitz v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. The People v. BradfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Thompson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  2. Moldenhauer v. KrynskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. 222 East Chestnut Street Corp. v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  4. Elbers v. Standard Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  5. Korbelik v. StaschkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API