Legal Opinion

Cody v. Hillard

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1987No. Nos. 85-5270, 85-5302PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court requiring officials at the South Dakota State Penitentiary (SDSP) to cease the double-celling of inmates at SDSP, both in the general population and in protective custody. On appeal, before a panel of this Court, the officials contended that the trial court erred in finding that double-celling of inmates at SDSP violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. They also claimed that the District Court erred in using the “rated capacities” of the American Corrections Association (ACA) as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Frank James v. Milwaukee County and Franklin LotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Inmates of Occoquan, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Marion S. Barry, Mayor, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Willard Ralph Vosburg v. Herman Solem and Richard RistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. Tillery v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API