Legal Opinion

Tillery v. Owens

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1990No. 89-3689PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I

Issue

In this appeal we are called upon to review the district court’s findings and conclusion that double-celling inmates in an overcrowded, dilapidated and unsanitary state prison violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. The defendants/appellants also question the extent of the district court’s power to ameliorate prison conditions.

Appellees, inmates at the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh (SCIP), brought suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against David…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Eddie Williams v. J.H. Griffin, Superintendent J.C. Harris, Jr., Area Administrator Aaron J. Johnson, Secretary of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  3. Mitchell v. DodrillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Young v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Frank James v. Milwaukee County and Franklin LotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API