Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Schneider

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 18, 1994No. 98, September Term, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

335 Md. 500 (1994)

644 A.2d 510

JANET MARIE SCHNEIDER

v.

MARK REYNOLDS SCHNEIDER.

No. 98, September Term, 1993.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 18, 1994.

Barry J.C. Kissin, Frederick, argued for petitioner.

William R. Nicklas, Jr., argued and on brief (Mary Ann Ferguson, Doherty, Elliot & Nicklas, P.A., on brief), Frederick, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Here, a divorced woman sought specifically to enforce against her former husband a contract for support that was not referred to in the divorce decree. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Zouck v. ZouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Adams v. ManownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Roman v. MaliCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API