Legal Opinion

Triplett v. . Foster

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

This is a motion to docket and dismiss under Rule 17. This motion was not made at the close of the call of the docket of the district to which it belongs, but since. And now, during the same term, being the first term of this Court after the trial below, the appellant has brought up the transcript of the appeal and docketed the same. This brings the case directly under Bryan v. Moving, 99 N. C., 16, as explained in Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127, on p. 130.

If, notwithstanding his failure to docket in time for argument at this term, the appellant thus obtains a delay of six months,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Bryan v. . MoringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Paine v. . CuretonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Benedict v. Jones.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Haynes v. . CowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Speller v. . SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Armour Packing Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API