Legal Opinion

Paine v. . Cureton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Tn this caso an appeal by defendants was dismissed on motion of plaintiffs and defendants moved to re-instate upon the grounds mentioned in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

This appeal, not having been docketed before the close of the call of causes of the district to which it belongs, was dismissed upon certificate filed .as provided in Rule 17. At the same Term the appellant moved to re-instate on the allegation that he had directed the Clerk to send up the transcript and had paid the fees therefor in advance, and that there was no laches on his part. This .would have been a sufficient answer to the motion by appel-lee to dismiss, if the appellant had then filed affidavit to that effect and asked for a certiorari. It was laches not to do this, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hahn v. . GuilfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Foster v. . PenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Triplett v. . FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Dunn v. . BagbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Carstarphen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Vivian v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Benedict v. Jones.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Haynes v. . CowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Wiley v. Bessemer City Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API