Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Dawson v. Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1975No. 1081 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

Before us for disposition is defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings filed pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. *552No. 1034. The pleadings in the instant case consist of plaintiff’s complaint in mandamus, alleging an abuse of defendant’s discretion in recommitting him as a technical parole violator, defendant’s answer thereto and new matter, and plaintiff’s answer to new matter.

It is axiomatic that the extraordinary relief of mandamus only lies when the plaintiff’s right to relief is clear and convincing. It does not lie when the Board exercises its discretion, unless…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aughenbaugh v. North American Refractories Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Banks v. Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kuykendall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Nickens v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Wyoming Sand & Stone Co. v. Department of RevenueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Harbold v. CarsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Phillips v. Township of NevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API