Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 18, 2013No. 08C40934; A147154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted by the court, on stipulated facts, of three counts of using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct, three counts of first-degree encouraging child sexual abuse, and one count of second-degree sodomy. On appeal, defendant argues that, under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, the court plainly erred in proceeding with the stipulated facts trial without a written waiver of the right to a jury trial. State v. Barber, 343 Or 525, 530, 173 P3d 827 (2007) (“There is no waiver of a jury trial unless that waiver is in writing and, without a waiver,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BarberOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. AmsberyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API