Legal Opinion

Brown v. McNeil

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 2009No. 1D08-3141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Ulysses Brown, challenges the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because this is Appellant’s sixteenth action in this court, we ordered him to show cause why this court should not summarily affirm the order on review, under rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure; why Appellant should not be sanctioned pursuant to rule 9.410, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure for filing a frivolous appeal; and why such sanctions should not include a direction to the Clerk of this Court to reject any future filings Appellant submits to this Court relating to his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Pettway v. McNeilSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caiazzo v. American Royal Arts Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Franklin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. ROBENSON v. McNeilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Brown v. CrewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API