Caiazzo v. American Royal Arts Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
I. Overview
After a great deal of judicial labor was focused on this case, but before this opinion was released, the Appellant filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. Because we believe that this case involves an issue of great public importance, we have decided not to dismiss this ease and instead to' release an opinion explaining our decision. We consider the issue presented in this case — the role the internet plays in a specific and general jurisdiction analysis — to be of great public importance because it involves a confusing area of the law that is mainly scattered across the federal…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Banco De Los Trabajadores v. Cortez MorenoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- Estes v. RodinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Metnick & Levy, P.A. v. SeulingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Hinkle v. Continental Motors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.