Legal Opinion

Keagle v. Pessell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Branch. (Loveridge, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Complainants appeal.. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

The bill in this case is filed to fore- ' close a certain mortgage given by the defendant to John and Hannah Hill, executed April 2, 1873. The time and *619manner of payment in the mortgage was in the following terms:

“ Provided always, and these presents are upon the-express condition, that if the said party of the first part Bhall and do well and truly pay, or-cause to be paid, to the said parties of the second part the sum of five hundred dollars annually during the life-time of both or either of them, in semi-annual payments, to be paid two-hundred and fifty dollars on the first of April, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carmichael v. CarmichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Mosloski v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Schofield v. SchofieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Expansion Realty Co. v. GerenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Ayers v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API