Legal Opinion

Griffiths v. Sanitary District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 22, 1912No. Gen. No. 17,125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term. 1910.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

This controversy arises out of a contract entered into by the appellants with the appellee, hereinafter referred to respectively as the plaintiffs and defendant, for the excavation of the rock and earth in a portion of the main drainage canal of the Sanitary District of Chicago, described as section one, and for the construction of certain work incident thereto. The action was assumpsit, the declaration containing the common counts and an additional count which alleges:

“That the defendant being a body politic and corporate,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chisholm v. Beaman Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sexton v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Sanitary District of Chicago v. McMahon & Montgomery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Tucker v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. 68-103 (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API