Legal Opinion

Department of Mental Health v. Mitchell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1975No. 73-380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

The defendant appeals from a judgment requiring him to pay the sum of $345.14 to the Department of Mental Health, as the outstanding portion of monies due for the care and support of the defendant’s daughter. The trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

The three questions presented for review are:(1) Was the defendant precluded from raising the factual issue, as to whether there was payment, by failure to use administrative review?(2) Was this a proper case for summary judgment?(3) Did the statute of limitations bar this action?

We answer the first two questions in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. PothsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. Walker v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Department of Public Welfare v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Frick v. O'Hare-Chicago Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. Harmon v. SwiftAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Mental Health v. BeilAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. St. Francis Medical Center v. VernonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Davis v. World Credit Fund I, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API