Perkins v. Adams
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CLARIE, District Judge.
The Supreme Court observed in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963) that to deny an indigent the right to appointed counsel for his first appeal would draw an unconstitutional line between rich and poor defendants. This habeas corpus petition presents questions involving the implementation of the Douglas mandate. The petitioner maintains that he has been denied his constitutional rights to appeal and to appeal with the assistance of court-appointed counsel as an indigent. The Court finds…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aubrey Pate v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby Prison, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joel Smith v. The Hon. Daniel McMann Warden of the Auburn State Prison, Auburn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.