Legal Opinion
Pavulak v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 31, 2017No. Crim. No. 09-43SLR; Civ. No. 14-290-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, Senior District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Paul E. Pavulak (“movant”) is a federal inmate currently confined at the USP Tucson in Tucson, Arizona. Movant timely filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (D.I. 135) The government filed an answer in opposition. (D.I. 157) For the reasons discussed, the court will deny mov-ant’s § 2255 motion without holding an evidentiary hearing.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
After being released from prison on July 1, 2008, movant was required to register as a sex offender by virtue of two…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Hakum Brown State v. Rodney Brown (083353) (Essex County, Middlesex County, & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
- State v. Hakum Brown; State v. Rodney BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2021