State Ex Rel. Donaldson v. Waldrop
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MOTION to vacaté a recognizance, heard before Ganmn, J.r at Spring Term 1869, óf the Superior Court of Cherokee. This was a proceeding commenced in the usual form before-a Justice of the Peace, in which the relator' charged the-defendant with being the father of her bastard child.
Read the full summary
MOTION to vacaté a recognizance, heard before Ganmn, J.r at Spring Term 1869, óf the Superior Court of Cherokee. This was a proceeding commenced in the usual form before-a Justice of the Peace, in which the relator' charged the-defendant with being the father of her bastard child. The Justice bound him over' to the nest term of the Superior' Court for the County, when he appeared arid' moved to-vacate-the recognizance, on the-ground that it’ should have been returnable before the County Commissioners, and that the Superior Court had no -jurisdiction of the case. The Judge refused the motion,…
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
(After stating the case as above.) It is difficult to imagine a reason for supposing that the County' Commissioners, had any jurisdiction in the premises. They have no judicial powers at all. Proceedings in bastardy are in the nature of a civil action. State ex. rel. Adams v. Pate, Bus. 244. The Superior Court have exclusive original jurisdiction in all cases when it is not given to some other Court. Const. .Art. IY, Sec. 15. Chapter 12 of the Revised Code concerning •bastardy is still in force, except so far as it has been incidentally modified by the change in the system of Courts. The…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- State v. . McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- State v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898