Legal Opinion

State v. . McIntosh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1870Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the trial of the issues, the defendant tendered himself as a witness, but his Honor excluded him, as incompetent. The defendant excepted.

Verdict, Guilty; Judgment accordingly, and Appeal by the defendant. A proceeding in bastardy, is a civil action, as distinguished from a criminal action: Const. Art. IV, § 1.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure, it is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a civil action proper. In such special proceeding a party may be examined as a witness in his own behalf: C.C.P. §§ 342-3;State v. Waldrop, 63 N.C. 507; State v. Pate, 44 N.C. 244.

There was error in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benbow v. . Robbins .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. State v. . CrouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. State v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. State v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. State v. LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API