Legal Opinion

Huschle v. Morris

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;— heard in that court on appeal from the City Court of East-St. Louis, the Hon. Benjamin H. Canby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was an action of replevin, brought by Wendele Huschle •against Harry Morris, to recover possession of the following goods and chattels, to-wit: all the goods and groceries, shelving, counters,-and other property of every description then in the building occupied and used by George H. Becker, as a grocery store, in the city of East St. Louis. The declaration was in the cepit and detinet, and all subsequent formal pleadings were waived by the parties, it being stipulated that either party might introduce at the trial any evidence which would be competent under proper pleadings. The defense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gardner v. . McEwenNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Davis v. RansomIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Corgan v. FrewIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Thompson v. WilhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Poleman v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. National Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Garbe v. HUMISTON-KEELING AND COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1956
  3. Jacobson v. PattersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  4. Pinkstaff v. CochranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  5. Superior Partners v. Professional Education Network, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API