Gardner v. . McEwen

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The mortgage was not fraudulent upon its face. It was of all the property of a particular description in a certain store; and that was sufficiently definite as to the property on hand. So far as it professed to convey property which Collins should afterwards purchase and put into the store, it was inoperative; and the court so charged. But the circumstance that Collins attempted to mortgage property which he did not then possess, did not render invalid the…