Legal Opinion

Norman v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 13, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

Plaintiff, D. B. Norman, has been in the employ of defendant since August 20, 1923. On or about October 21, 1955, after thirty-two years of service, he made a request for retirement with pay pursuant to a “Plan for Employees’ Pensions, Disability Benefits, and Death Benefits” (herein called “the Plan”), which defendant originally adopted in January, 1913, and has more or less continuously held out to its employees as one of the benefits of their employment.

We shall herein refer to Norman as “plaintiff” and to the defendant, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company as “the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Gatliff Coal Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Hughes v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. Reager's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Smith v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Hackett v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  3. Lano v. Rochester Germicide Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. General Electric Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. Greer v. National Carbide Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API