Legal Opinion

Svetik v. Svetik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1988No. 2806PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the appellee partnership. The question presented is whether a general partner (Joseph T. Svetik) has a cause of action against his partnership for negligence resulting in personal injuries sustained by him as he examined the partnership premises. We hold that, under the facts of this case and the present state of the law in Pennsylvania, appellant has no such cause of action.

The facts are as follows. Joseph T. Svetik, an appellant herein, 1 and Michael R. Martino, Jr. entered into a written agreement…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Helvering v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. First Pennsylvania Bank, N. A. v. TriesterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Pro MacHineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In Re: Estate of Caruso, P., Appeal of: Caruso, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Hays v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hays v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re: Estate of Peter J. CarusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API