Hays v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
URBIGKIT, Justice,
specially concurring.
I agree to affirm the benefit denial, but differ in extension of this decision to determinations not required for present disposition. Controlling in my perspective are the facts that the partnership had no account for worker’s compensation and that neither partner made any effort to comply with premium payment requirements which would demonstrate intent to establish an employer/employee status within the partnership operation for worker’s compensation purposes or otherwise.
I do not necessarily agree that a partnership is not a separate entity from its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Boehm v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Meyer v. KendigWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Baker v. Wendy's of Montana, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.