Legal Opinion

Michigan State Chamber of Commerce v. Austin

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 3, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 83-2263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

The Secretary of State (“Secretary”) moves to alter or amend the judgment entered July 22, 1986 pursuant to my Memorandum Opinion (July 11, 1986), 637 F.Supp. 1192 declaring § 54(3) of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, Mich.Comp. Laws § 169.254(3), void for overbreadth. The Secretary seeks to cure the over-breadth with a new1 interpretation of the statute:

4. I now interpret [§ 54(3) of the Act] as follows and will administer and enforce this statute consistent with this interpretation:

A. Open and innocent associations by corporations are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Samuel Eubanks, M.D. v. Wallace WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
Samuel Eubanks, M.D. v. Wallace WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991