Legal Opinion

Eagen v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1951No. Appeal, 30PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Drew,

The Honorable Michael J. Eagen, appellant, contends that he was lawfully elected a justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania at the general election held November 7, 1950, and brought this proceeding in mandamus to compel the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Honorable Gene D. Smith, to so certify. The Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County refused to issue the writ and this appeal was then filed.

The question before us arises because of the untimely deaths of three members of this Court in the first half of 1950 — Mr. Justice Patterson on January 6, Mr.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. BlankenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Noble v. FiorinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Butcher v. Trimarchi, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1962
  4. Eagen v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API