Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Noble v. Fiorina

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1960No. 6831PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus, instituted to require the respondent to place the name of the petitioner on the ballot to be voted on at the general election in November of 1960.

Briefly, the facts giving rise to the controversy are that the New Mexico primary election, at which time the major political parties nominated their candidates to run in the general election was held in May of 1960. In that primary, there were two positions voted on for nomination for the supreme court, • one being for a full term and the other being for an unexpired term. Thereafter and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunham v. StitzbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lanigan v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Delgado v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Brown v. GeorgettaNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State ex rel. Oleson v. MinorNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bounds v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Robinson v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Johnson v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bounds v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Hand v. WinterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API