Guaranty Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Horseshoe Operating Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
WHITHAM, Justice.
Appellee, The Horseshoe Operating Company, sued appellant, Guaranty Federal Savings and Loan Association, on Guaranty’s “official check.” We must determine if that check is analogous to a cashier’s check, which is deemed accepted when issued and is, therefore, not subject to a stop-payment order. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted Horseshoe’s motion and denied Guaranty’s motion. We conclude that the check is analogous to a cashier’s check. Hence, we treat the check as a cashier’s check not subject to a stop-payment order. As to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Morgan v. Compugraphic Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Strickland v. Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver of Community Savings & Loan Association v. Peter JuergensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Chicago Cicero Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Bernard Morello v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.