Legal Opinion
State v. Randle
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1986No. C3-85-965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
After a trial to the court on a stipulated record, appellant Earnest Randle was convicted of aggravated forgery in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.625, subd. 1(1) (1984) and uttering a forged instrument in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.625, subd. 3 (1984). On appeal, Randle challenges the validity of the initial investigatory stop. We affirm.
FACTS
Randle was convicted of forging a check with Hestoria Smith for the purpose of buying a video cassette recorder from the Sound of Music store in Roseville, Minnesota.
At the omnibus hearing, Officer Robert Hawley testified that on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of West St. Paul v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987