Legal Opinion

Smythe Cramer Co. v. Guinta

Medina Municipal Court

Decided November 26, 2001No. 98 CVJ 00018PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dale H. Chase, Judge.

This matter is before the court pursuant to a request for exemption from a garnishment of personal earnings filed against the defendant, Susan J. Guinta. The garnishee, Russell Realtors, objected to the decision of Magistrate Charles T. Lawrie that recommended that the . garnishment of funds held by Russell Realtors for Susan Guinta be allowed to proceed. For the reasons stated herein, the magistrate’s decision is adopted.

The defendant, Susan Guinta, is a licensed real estate sálesperson. Plaintiff seeks a garnishment of personal earnings to attach real estate commissions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. Cleveland Municipal CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1971
  2. Willhite v. WillhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Columbia Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Bancohio National Bank v. BoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Bank One, Cleveland, N.A. v. Lincoln Electric Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. Rhodes v. SinclairOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API