Legal Opinion

United States v. Carpenter

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 25, 2019No. 18-cr-362 (ADS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARTHUR D. SPATT, United States District Judge

Presently before the Court is a motion by Larry Carpenter ("Carpenter" or the "Defendant"), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (" FED. R. CRIM. P. " or "Rule") 41, seeking to suppress all fruits of the search of a cellular phone. For the following reasons, the Defendant's motion is denied in its entirety.

*82I. BACKGROUND

On June 24, 2018, Carpenter was arrested in East Farmingdale, New York. The arrest stemmed from two alleged drug sales: one where the Defendant purportedly sold 1.3 grams of crack-cocaine to a third party, and the other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. RommyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Fnu LnuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. MunozDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API