United States v. Carpenter
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR D. SPATT, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is a motion by Larry Carpenter ("Carpenter" or the "Defendant"), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (" FED. R. CRIM. P. " or "Rule") 41, seeking to suppress all fruits of the search of a cellular phone. For the following reasons, the Defendant's motion is denied in its entirety.
*82I. BACKGROUND
On June 24, 2018, Carpenter was arrested in East Farmingdale, New York. The arrest stemmed from two alleged drug sales: one where the Defendant purportedly sold 1.3 grams of crack-cocaine to a third party, and the other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. RommyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Fnu LnuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MunozDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.