Legal Opinion

East & West Coast Service Corp. v. Papahagis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1941No. Appeal, 93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order of the court below discharging defendant’s rule to show cause why disputed issues of fact arising in a suit in equity should not be tried by a jury. Such an order is interlocutory only. Cf. Stewart v. Stewart, 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 593. Defendant also assigns error to the dismissal of his preliminary objections to plaintiff’s amended bill and to the sustaining of plaintiff’s preliminary objections to defendant’s answer containing new matter. These orders, also, are interlocutory: Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company v. Johnston & Harder, Inc., 330…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Lewis v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Stewart v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stadler v. Mt. Oliver BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Miller Estate v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Amaral v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Yellow Cab & Bus Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1945
  5. York Telephone & Telegraph Co. Employes Case, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API