Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hope Academy Broadway Campus v. White Hat Mgt., L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2015No. 2013-2050Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKennedy, J.

{¶ 49} Respectfully, I concur in part and dissent in part. I agree with paragraph one of the syllabus, which merely reiterates R.C. 3314.02(A)(8)(a)’s definition of “operator” as an “organization * * * that manages the daily operations of a community school pursuant to a contract between the operator and the *43school’s governing authority.” I also concur in the judgment to the extent that it affirms the judgment of the court of appeals. I disagree with paragraphs two and three of the syllabus and dissent from the part of the judgment reversing the judgment of the court of appeals, although it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ed Schory & Sons, Inc. v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Stone v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In re Termination of Employment of PrattOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Soberay MacHine & Equipment Company, (96-3946 97-3308)/cross-Appellee v. Mrf Limited, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (96-3997)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Cordray v. International Preparatory SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API