Legal Opinion
Malapanis v. Regan
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 2004No. 3:03CV1758 (JBA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Regan, Bannon, Miller-Sullivan, and Blumenthal [Doc. #26]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
This action arises out of a dispute over computer equipment that plaintiffs Gina Malapanis (“Malapanis”) and Computers Plus Center, Inc. (“CPC”) sold to the State of Connecticut. Defendants include, inter alia, Greg P. Regan, Chief Information Officer for the State of Connecticut’s Department of Information Technology (“DOIT”), Mark Bannon and Holly Miller-Sullivan, two managers with the DOIT, and Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of the State of Connecticut…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- TADCO Construction Corp. v. Dormitory AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Gilbert v. North Carolina State BarDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Gizzo v. Ben-HabibDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Grasson v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Radwan v. University of Connecticut Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020