Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. Where on the trial no evidence is introduced save that in behalf of the plaintiff, and such evidence makes a prima facie ease, but on cross-examination the plaintiff disproves her ease by establishing beyond doubt the existence of other defensive facts which make it manifest on the whole evidence that she ought not to recover, then, under the Code, § 110-310, “a nonsuit will be granted.” Evans v. Josephine Mills, 119 Ga. 448, 450 (46 S. E. 674) ; Evans v. Schofield, 120 Ga. 961 (48 S. E. 358); Nants v. Martin, 41 Ga. App. 453 (153 S. E. 440); Flippin v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 35 Ga.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Steele v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Southern Bank v. GoetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Exposition Cotton Mills v. Western & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Dykes v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Norair Engineering Corp. v. Saint Joseph's Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Jackson's Mill & Lumber Co. v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.