Legal Opinion

Gabert v. Eastus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1933No. 12853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DATTXMORE, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for damages, alleging that appellant had converted an automobile belonging to appellee.

Appellant answered by a general denial only.

Appellee’s testimony showed a bill of sale, regular on its face, transferring the title in the car to appellee, the car being then in the possession of appellant and never in ap-pellee; the demand by appellee upon appellant for possession and the refusal thereof; and the damages.

Appellant proved without objection thereto that the car (a Ford) had been taken by the police from one Burkhead and stored with appellant under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Heffron v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hennessy v. Automobile Owners' Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Chapman v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Mullin v. Nash-El Paso Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eastus v. GabertTexas Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API