Legal Opinion

Rein Monroe Associates v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in failing to dismiss plaintiff’s fourth and fifth causes of action. Plaintiff’s fourth cause of action seeks damages premised on alleged violations of Insurance Law § 2601, and its fifth cause of action seeks damages on a common-law theory of bad faith premised on the unfair claim settlement practices. Because Insurance Law § 2601 does not create a private right of action, the fourth cause of action should have been dismissed (see, Royal Globe Ins.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Halpin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Hubbell v. Trans World Life Ins. Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. M. S. R. Associates Ltd. v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Royal Globe Insurance v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Dano v. Royal Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jonas v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API