Rein Monroe Associates v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in failing to dismiss plaintiff’s fourth and fifth causes of action. Plaintiff’s fourth cause of action seeks damages premised on alleged violations of Insurance Law § 2601, and its fifth cause of action seeks damages on a common-law theory of bad faith premised on the unfair claim settlement practices. Because Insurance Law § 2601 does not create a private right of action, the fourth cause of action should have been dismissed (see, Royal Globe Ins.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Halpin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hubbell v. Trans World Life Ins. Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- M. S. R. Associates Ltd. v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Dano v. Royal Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jonas v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997