Legal Opinion
Dano v. Royal Globe Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 1983PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*829OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The first cause of action for defamation is against the Andrews law firm, Royal Globe and Patrick DiDomenico, Royal’s manager. It concerns a disclaimer letter written by the Andrews law firm to plaintiffs, their attorney and their adjuster. Nothing in the complaint or affidavits submitted on plaintiffs’ behalf presents a triable issue as to publication by Royal Globe or DiDomenico. As to the Andrews firm, although there is no question of publication, we agree with the Appellate Division that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gordon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Halpin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hubbell v. Trans World Life Ins. Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dillon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- John W. Riordan Jane Fox v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- General Star National Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Belco Petroleum Corp. v. AIG Oil Rig, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.