Commonwealth v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
The issue is whether the prosecutor at appellant’s trial for robbery violated the equal protection clause of the federal constitution by using peremptory challenges to exclude members of the appellant’s race from the trial jury. Appellant contends that under the legal standard articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the prosecutor failed to rebut a prima facie showing that the Commonwealth’s peremptory challenges had been used for a racially discriminatory purpose. We conclude that appellant’s claim…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Harmotta v. BenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.