D'Anofrio v. Hatten
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.
In an action grounded in negligence to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy is that afforded by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. It appears that there has been no administrative determination of the question, as plaintiff has not made a claim for workmen’s compensation. Therefore, the motion here may be granted only if it appears by the undisputed facts before the court that the defense is good as a matter of law. If the question of whether or not the plaintiff and defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Claim of Davis v. Newsweek MagazineNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of Di Salvio v. . Menihan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of McCarter v. LarockNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Pantolo v. LaneNew York Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Olsen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Olsen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Geller v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- O'Rourke v. LongNew York Court of Appeals · 1976