Olsen v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
The State Accident Insurance Fund correctly points out in its petition for reconsideration that our summary of D'Anofrio v. Hatten, 25 Misc2d 346, 206 NYS2d 494 (1960), was incorrect. In DAnofrio the New York Supreme Court held that the issue of whether an employe injured on the employer’s premises during the lunch period has an exclusive remedy under the Workmen’s Compensation Law is a question of fact. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a personal injury action was dismissed.
Our previous opinion held that an employe injured on the employer’s premises during the lunch break while…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Carling Brewing Co. v. BelznerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Askren v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- American Steel Foundries v. CzapalaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Thomsen v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Otto v. Moak Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Compensation of Halfman v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Wallace v. Green Thumb, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Halfman v. STATE ACC. INS. FUNDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Otto v. Moak Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.