Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Harbor Market, Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1995No. 1 — 94 — 2352PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice T. O’Brien

This case arises from a legal malpractice action against the law firm of Schiff, Hardin & Waite and one of its attorneys, Stuart Goodman. At issue is whether the lawsuit is barred under section 13— 214.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/13 — 214.3 (West 1992)), which contains a two-year statute of limitations and a six-year statute of repose. For reasons which follow, we hold that the suit is not barred as a matter of law, reverse the dismissal of the circuit court, and remand.

The alleged malpractice giving rise to this appeal involved a promissory note executed on April 29, 1985,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Lucey v. Law Offices of Pretzel & Stouffer, CharteredAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Ferguson v. McKenzieIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Evanston Insurance Co. v. RiseboroughIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Robert B. Kaplan v. Shure Brothers, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Arnold Weinberg, of Katz Randall & Weinberg, and Katz Randall & WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API