Legal Opinion
City of San Antonio v. Burke
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 15, 1933No. 9378PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
• In the exercise of its power of eminent domain, the city of San Antonio procured the condemnation of "certain real property belonging tó P. A. Astoria, to whom' duly appointed special commissioners awarded damages in the amount of $7,500. In pursuance of familiar statutory provisions, the city deposited said sum in the registry of the county court by paying over the same to Jack R. Burke, then county clerk of said county, through voucher carrying upon its face the following memorandum: “City Warrant No. 137, San Antonio, Texas, Feb. 3, 1930. The City Treasurer will pay to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Adoue & LobitTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. AdoueTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Coleman v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Ackerman v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Steere v. Stockyards Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cassel v. Mercantile Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Waggoner Nat. Bank of VernonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Thomas G. Steph, Individually and as Guardian of Thomas Carter Steph, a Minor v. James Harris Scott, Curt Steib, John Alvin HayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Dunagan v. BusheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953