Legal Opinion

Wishek v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

The pertinent matters on this appeal are well stated in the memorandum opinion of the trial judge as follows:

“This action is brought to recover the penalty, $2,000, of a fidelity bond, issued by the defendant to the plaintiffs, covering the fidelity of one George W. Freund, as a grain buyer, in an elevator owned 'by plaintiffs, at Danzig, ,N. D. The bond, while being more liberal than some of its kind, covers loss occurring through the larceny or embezzlement of the employe, in the business; and,- as the evidence shows conclusively that, if any loss is proved,, it resulted from what amounts,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flath v. Bankers Casualty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Baird v. National Surety Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Denney v. Spot Martin, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Glens Falls Insurance v. Linwood ElevatorMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Shreve v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Hill v. Chappel Bros. of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API