Legal Opinion
Limjoco v. Schenck
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 10, 1992No. 91-2658PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This appeal involves the interpretation of the statute granting immunity from liability to those who in good faith participate in peer review of health care providers, sec. 146.37, Stats. We affirm the summary judgment dismissing Dr. Uriel Limjoco's claim against Drs. Jeffrey and Beth Schenck for conspiracy and tortious interference with contract because the Schencks had the good faith belief that they were participating in a peer review of Limjoco's surgical decisions, and Limjoco established no facts or inferences to negate the presumption of good faith they enjoyed as participants in that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. EichmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- State v. LivingstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Meunier v. OgurekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Phillip F. Winskunas v. James G. Birnbaum and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Awve v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Irwin Harris, M.D. v. Bellin Memorial Hospital and Confidential Peer Review, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.