Legal Opinion
Altman v. 285 W. Fourth LLC
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
Decided April 26, 2018No. 44PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge DiFIORE.
**466*859The issue on this appeal is whether the 20% vacancy increase should be included when calculating the legal regulated rent for purposes of determining whether the subject apartment has reached the $2,000 deregulation threshold in the Rent Stabilization Law. We conclude that the vacancy increase must be included in that calculation.
In November 2003, plaintiff Richard Altman entered into a sublease with Keno Rider, who had been the tenant of the ***183subject apartment since 1993. Rider had a rent-stabilized lease with the prior landlord at a legal regulated rent of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Altman v. 285 West Fourth, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Altman v. 285 West Fourth LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hart v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Brookford, LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- LG 2 Doe v. JasinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. v. Episcopal Church Home & Affiliates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Altman v. 285 W. Fourth LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.